Volume 7, Issue 3 (Autumn 2020)                   johe 2020, 7(3): 1-8 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Monazzam M R, fahim A, ahmadi S, Hashemi Z. Effect of Surface Shape on Perforated Acoustic Absorber Performance Using Numerical and Experimental Methods. johe 2020; 7 (3) :1-8
URL: http://johe.umsha.ac.ir/article-1-605-en.html
1- Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
3- Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Health, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran
4- School of Medical Sciences, Behbahan, Khuzestan Province, Iran , z_hashemi26@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (2559 Views)
Background and Objective: Perforated panels are one of the most common resonant absorbers for sound control. These types of absorbers are widely used due to their adjustable mechanical properties and ease of processing. This study was conducted to investigate the acoustic properties of non-flat perforated panels in oblique angle and diffusion field using both numerical and experimental methods.
Materials and Methods: To investigate the effect of surface shape on the performance of the perforated panel, three non-flat shapes were considered for the perforated panel and their absorption performance was compared with the usual shape of the perforated panel (i.e., flat) using the numerical method. Initially, the most appropriate shape was determined in terms of absorption coefficient. Afterward, the desired shape was constructed in the dimensions approved by the ISO 354 and subjected to a random incidence absorption coefficient test in the reverberation chamber.
Results: The results of numerical simulation indicated that the shapes defined in this research all could improve the absorption coefficient at the middle and high frequencies. Moreover, the shape C showed a higher absorption coefficient at the lower frequencies than the flat and the two defined shapes. Based on the measurement of a random incidence absorption coefficient, the highest absorption coefficient was obtained at a frequency of 160 Hz with a value of 0.77. These conditions were implemented in a numerical environment and the random incidence absorption coefficient was calculated according to the existing relationships.
Conclusion: It can be concluded that surface shape is effective in improving the absorption performance of these types of adsorbents. The comparison of numerical and laboratory results showed the acceptable agreement of these two methods and the numerical method is capable of predicting this quantity with good accuracy.
Full-Text [PDF 1707 kb]   (1337 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research Article | Subject: Physical agents

References
1. Li G, Mechefske CK. A comprehensive experimental study of micro-perforated panel acoustic absorbers in MRI scanners. MAGMA. 2010;23(3):177-85. PMID: 20464444 DOI: 10.1007/s10334-010-0216-9
2. Allam S, Åbom M. Fan noise control using microperforated splitter silencers. J Vib Acoust. 2014;136(3):31017. DOI: 10.1115/1.4027245
3. Jing X, Peng S, Sun X. A straightforward method for wall impedance education in a flow duct. J Acoust Soc Am. 2008;124(1):227-34. PMID: 18646970 DOI: 10.1121/1.2932256
4. Corin RA, Weste L. Sound of silence. Kent: Industrial Vehicle Technology International; 2005. P. 105-7.
5. Dalton DS, Cruickshanks KJ, Klein BE, Klein R, Wiley TL, Nondahl DM. The impact of hearing loss on quality of life in older adults. Gerontologist. 2003;43(5):661-8. PMID: 14570962 DOI: 10.1093/geront/43.5.661
6. Kramer SE, Kapteyn TS, Kuik DJ, Deeg DJ. The association of hearing impairment and chronic diseases with psychosocial health status in older age. J Aging Health. 2002;14(1):122-37. PMID: 11892756 DOI: 10.1177/089826430201400107
7. Fuchs HV, Zha X. Micro-perforated structures as sound absorbers-a review and outlook. Acta Acust United Acustica. 2006;92(1):139-46.
8. Fuchs HV, Zha X. Acrylic-glass sound absorbers in the plenum of the Deutscher Bundestag. Appl Acoust. 1997;51(2):211-7. DOI: 10.1016/S0003-682X(96)00064-3
9. Bies DA, Hansen C, Howard C. Engineering noise control. Florida: CRC Press; 2017.
10. Wang C, Huang L, Zhang Y. Oblique incidence sound absorption of parallel arrangement of multiple micro-perforated panel absorbers in a periodic pattern. J Sound Vib. 2014;333(25):6828-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2014.08.009
11. Lee DH, Kwon YP. Estimation of the absorption performance of multiple layer perforated panel systems by transfer matrix method. J Sound Vib. 2004;278(4-5):847-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2003.10.017
12. Hashemi Z, Monazzam MR, Fahim A. Estimation of sound absorption performance of complex perforated panel absorbers by numerical finite element method and examinining the role of different layouts behind it. Fluctuation Noise Lett. 2019;18(3):1950013. DOI: 10.1142/S0219477519500135
13. Chen WH, Lee FC, Chiang DM. On the acoustic absorption of porous materials with different surface shapes and perforated plates. J Sound Vib. 2000;237(2):337-55. DOI: 10.1006/jsvi.2000.3029
14. Easwaran V, Munjal ML. Finite element analysis of wedges used in anechoic chambers. J Sound Vib. 1993;160(2):333-50. DOI: 10.1006/jsvi.1993.1027
15. Maa DY. Potential of microperforated panel absorber. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998;104(5):2861-6. DOI: 10.1121/1.423870
16. Morse PM, Bolt RH. Sound waves in rooms. Rev Mod Phys. 1944;16(2):69.
17. Standard B, ISO B. Acoustics-Measurement of sound absorption in a reverberation room. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization ISO Central Secretariat; 2003.
18. Cox TJ, D'antonio P. Acoustic absorbers and diffusers: theory, design and application. Florida: CRC Press; 2009.
19. Wang C, Cheng L, Pan J, Yu G. Sound absorption of a micro-perforated panel backed by an irregular-shaped cavity. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010;127(1):238-46. PMID: 20058969 DOI: 10.1121/1.3257590
20. Yang C, Cheng L. Sound absorption of microperforated panels inside compact acoustic enclosures. J Sound Vib. 2016;360:140-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2015.09.024
21. Fujiwara K, Miyajima T. Absorption characteristics of a practically constructed Shroeder diffuser of quadratic-residue type. Appl Acoust. 1992;35(2):149-52. DOI: 10.1016/0003-682X(92)90029-R
22. Wu T, Cox TJ, Lam YW. From a profiled diffuser to an optimized absorber. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000;108(2):643-50. PMID: 10955630 DOI: 10.1121/1.429596

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Occupational Hygiene Engineering

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb