Volume 8, Issue 1 (Spring 2021)                   johe 2021, 8(1): 65-73 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Abdollahzade Sani A, Yarahmadi R, Abolghasemi J, Firouzbakhsh M, Besharati J, Alimohammadi I. Prioritization of Noise Control Methods by the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) in a Battery Factory. johe 2021; 8 (1) :65-73
URL: http://johe.umsha.ac.ir/article-1-685-en.html
1- Department of Occupational health, School of Public Health , Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
2- Department of Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
4- Department of Environment Engineering, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment , Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
5- Department of Environment Management, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment , Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
6- Department of Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , irajrastin1@gmail.com
Abstract:   (2095 Views)
Background and Objective: Due to major constraints on time, implementation, and funding in every industry, one of the essential strategies for the management of noise control and selection of the best method is to prioritize noise control methods. The present study aimed to prioritize noise control methods in a battery factory using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP).
Materials and Methods: The present study was conducted based on a descriptive-analytical cross-sectional design. After measurement of sound pressure level and identification of the main sources of noise pollution, Content Validity Index (CVI) and Content Validity Ratio (CVR) were used for screening the criteria and methods of noise control. The relative weight of each of them was calculated by two factors of Eigenvalue and Eigenvector to prioritize noise control methods based on the study criteria.
Results: Based on the results, the Inconsistency Ratio (IR) in pairwise comparisons in all cases was less than 10%, and the consistency of the answers was confirmed. Moreover, among the study criteria, the acoustic efficiency of method with weight (0.1810), and among the proposed methods for noise control, the method of controlling the time of exposure to noise and training of workers with weight (0.1732) had the highest priority.
Conclusion: As evidenced by the obtained results, the best criterion for selecting a sound control device is the acoustic efficiency of the method. Furthermore, based on the results, controlling the duration of exposure to noise and training workers in conditions of high noise exposure was the best method to control noise in a battery factory.
Full-Text [PDF 1179 kb]   (582 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research Article | Subject: Physical agents

1. Atmaca E, Peker I, Altin A. Industrial noise and its effects on humans. Polish J Environ Stud. 2005;14(6):721-6. [DOI]
2. van Kempen E, van Kamp I, Fischer P, Davies H, Houthuijs D, Stellato R, et al. Noise exposure and children’s blood pressure and heart rate: the RANCH project. Occup Environ Med. 2006;63(9):632–9. PMID: 16728500 DOI: 10.1136/oem.2006.026831 [DOI]
3. Kraus U, Schneider A, Breitner S, Hampel R, Rückerl R, Pitz M, et al. Individual daytime noise exposure during routine activities and heart rate variability in adults: a repeated measures study. Environ Health Perspect. 2013;121(5):607-12. PMID: 23512292 DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1205606 [DOI]
4. Burns KN, Sun K, Fobil JN, Neitzel RL. Heart rate, stress, and occupational noise exposure among electronic waste recycling workers. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13(1):140. PMID: 26797626 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph13010140 [DOI]
5. Münzel T, Sørensen M, Schmidt F, Schmidt E, Steven S, Kröller-Schön S, et al. The adverse effects of environmental noise exposure on oxidative stress and cardiovascular risk. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2018;28(9):873-908. PMID: 29350061 DOI: 10.1089/ars.2017.7118 [DOI]
6. Samson J, Sheeladevi R, Ravindran R. Oxidative stress in brain and antioxidant activity of Ocimum sanctum in noise exposure. Neurotoxicology. 2007;28(3):679–85. PMID: 17379314 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuro.2007.02.011 [DOI]
7. Åhrlin U. Activity disturbances caused by different environmental noises. J Sound Vib. 1988;127(3):599-603. DOI: 10.1016/0022-460X(88)90389-6 [DOI]
8. Phoon WH, Lee HS, Chia SE. Tinnitus in noise-exposed workers. Occup Med. 1993;43(1):35-8. PMID: 8422445 DOI: 10.1093/occmed/43.1.35 [DOI]
9. Janssen SA, Vos H, Eisses AR, Pedersen E. A comparison between exposure-response relationships for wind turbine annoyance and annoyance due to other noise sources. J Acoust Soc Am. 2011;130(6):3746-53. PMID: 22225031 DOI: 10.1121/1.3653984 [DOI]
10. Eze IC, Foraster M, Schaffner E, Vienneau D, Héritier H, Pieren R, et al. Transportation noise exposure, noise annoyance and respiratory health in adults: a repeated-measures study. Environ Int. 2018;121(Pt 1):741-50. PMID: 30321849 DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.10.006 [DOI]
11. Leung TM, Chau CK, Tang SK, Xu JM. Developing a multivariate model for predicting the noise annoyance responses due to combined water sound and road traffic noise exposure. Appl Acoust. 2017;127:284-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.06.020 [DOI]
12. Alimohammadi I, Sandrock S, Gohari MR. The effects of low frequency noise on mental performance and annoyance. Environ Monit Assess. 2013;185(8):7043-51. PMID: 23338951 DOI: 10.1007/s10661-013-3084-8 [DOI]
13. Sygna K, Aasvang GM, Aamodt G, Oftedal B, Krog NH. Road traffic noise, sleep and mental health. Environ Res. 2014;131:17–24. PMID: 24637180 DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2014.02.010 [DOI]
14. Halperin D. Environmental noise and sleep disturbances: a threat to health? Sleep Sci. 2014;7(4):209-12. PMID: 26483931 DOI: 10.1016/j.slsci.2014.11.003 [DOI]
15. Zaharna M, Guilleminault C. Sleep, noise and health. Noise Health. 2010;12(47):64. DOI: 10.4103/1463-1741.63205 [DOI]
16. Héritier H, Vienneau D, Foraster M, Eze IC, Schaffner E, Thiesse L, et al. Diurnal variability of transportation noise exposure and cardiovascular mortality: a nationwide cohort study from Switzerland. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2018;221(3):556-63. PMID: 29482991 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2018.02.005 [DOI]
17. Münzel T, Gori T, Babisch W, Basner M. Cardiovascular effects of environmental noise exposure. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(13):829-36. PMID: 24616334 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu030 [DOI]
18. Tomei G, Fioravanti M, Cerratti D, Sancini A, Tomao E, Rosati M V, et al. Occupational exposure to noise and the cardiovascular system: a meta-analysis. Sci Total Environ. 2010;408(4):681-9. PMID: 19931119 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.10.071 [DOI]
19. 19. Ristovska G, Laszlo HE, Hansell AL. Reproductive outcomes associated with noise exposure-a systematic review of the literature. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014;11(8):7931-52. PMID: 25101773 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph110807931 [DOI]
20. Barber JR, Crooks KR, Fristrup KM. The costs of chronic noise exposure for terrestrial organisms. Trends Ecol Evol. 2010;25(3):180-9. PMID: 19762112 DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2009.08.002 [DOI]
21. Picard M, Girard SA, Simard M, Larocque R, Leroux T, Turcotte F. Association of work-related accidents with noise exposure in the workplace and noise-induced hearing loss based on the experience of some 240,000 person-years of observation. Accid Anal Prev. 2008;40(5):1644-52. PMID: 18760091 DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2008.05.013 [DOI]
22. Girard SA, Picard M, Davis AC, Simard M, Larocque R, Leroux T, et al. Multiple work-related accidents: tracing the role of hearing status and noise exposure. Occup Environ Med. 2009;66(5):319-24. PMID: 19174422 DOI: 10.1136/oem.2007.037713 [DOI]
23. Cantley LF, Galusha D, Cullen MR, Dixon-Ernst C, Rabinowitz PM, Neitzel RL. Association between ambient noise exposure, hearing acuity, and risk of acute occupational injury. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2015;41(1):75-83. PMID: 25137556 5 DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.3450 [DOI]
24. Taqizade S, Eskandari H, Alimohammadi I, Jaderi F. A fuzzy expert system for selection of an effective method for noise reduction in a petrochemical complex. Noise Control Eng J. 2014;62(5):344-53. DOI: 10.3397/1/376233 [DOI]
25. Barron RF. Industrial noise control and acoustics. Florida: CRC Press; 2002. [DOI]
26. Hansen CH. Fundamentals of acoustics. Occupational exposure to noise: evaluation, prevention and control. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001. P. 23-52. [DOI]
27. Goelzer B, Hansen CH, Sehrndt G. Occupational exposure to noise: evaluation, prevention and control. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2001. [DOI]
28. Hobbs BF, Meier PM. Multicriteria methods for resource planning: an experimental comparison. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 1994;9(4):1811-7. DOI: 10.1109/59.331435 [DOI]
29. Triantaphyllou E. Multi-criteria decision making methods. Multi-criteria decision making methods: a comparative study. Boston, MA: Springer; 2000. P. 5–21. [DOI]
30. Saaty TL. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int J Serv Sci. 2008;1(1):83–98. DOI: 10.1504/IJSSci.2008.01759 [DOI]
31. Pal S, Bhadane MS, Babu C. Analytical hierarchical process: fundamentals and its application. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2015. [DOI]
32. Azar A, Vafaei F. Ranking MADM multi-index decision making techniques using some multi-criteria decision making methods in fuzzy environment and comparing it with DEA ranking. Manag Achiev. 2010;7(41):21-38. [DOI]
33. Alonso JA, Lamata MT. Consistency in the analytic hierarchy process: a new approach. Int J Uncertainty Fuzzin Knowl Based Syst. 2006;14(4):445-59. [DOI]
34. Baliatsas C, van Kamp I, van Poll R, Yzermans J. Health effects from low-frequency noise and infrasound in the general population: Is it time to listen? A systematic review of observational studies. Sci Total Environ. 2016;557:163–9. DOI: 10.1142/S0218488506004114 [DOI]
35. Bolin K, Bluhm G, Eriksson G, Nilsson ME. Infrasound and low frequency noise from wind turbines: exposure and health effects. Environ Res Lett. 2011;6(3):35103. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/6/3/035103 [DOI]
36. Atthirawong W, MacCarthy B. An application of the analytical hierarchy process to international location decision-making. The 7th Annual Cambridge International Manufacturing Symposium: Restructuring Global Manu-facturing, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England; 2002. P. 1–18. [DOI]
37. Sekhavati E, Mohammadi ZM, Mohammad FI, Faghihi ZA. Prioritizing methods of control and reduce noise pollution in Larestan cement Factory using analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Toloo-E-Behdasht. 2014;13(2):156-67. [DOI]
38. Mahboobe E, Golmohamadi R, Riahi-Korram M. Prioritizing of noise control methods in the Hamadan glass company by the analytical hierarchy process (AHP). J Occup Health Saf. 2012;2(1):75-84. [DOI]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2023 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Occupational Hygiene Engineering

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb