Volume 6, Issue 1 (Spring 2019)
johe 2019, 6(1): 26-34 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rshidi S, YARAHMADI R, Shobeiri S M, Mansourian M. Ranking Key Performance Indicators of Health, Safety, Environment, and Energy Education Using Multi-criteria Decision-making Techniques. johe 2019; 6 (1) :26-34
URL: http://johe.umsha.ac.ir/article-1-455-en.html
URL: http://johe.umsha.ac.ir/article-1-455-en.html
1- Department of Environmental Education, Tehran Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran , sahar_rashidi86@yahoo.com
2- Department of Occupational Health Engineering, Air Pollution Research Center, Labor Health Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3- Department of Environmental Education, Tehran Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran
4- Health Education and Promotion School of Health, School of Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Occupational Health Engineering, Air Pollution Research Center, Labor Health Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3- Department of Environmental Education, Tehran Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran
4- Health Education and Promotion School of Health, School of Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (5439 Views)
Background and Objective: The organization's performance in the field of health, safety, and environment (HSE) education is a prerequisite for the continuous improvement of management systems. Providing successful training requires the recognition and development of effective factors, such as key performance indicators. In addition, the indicators, such as the cost and the educational per capita that are normally being used, are not sufficient in this regard. The purpose of this study was to identify and rank important indicators in the performance of health, safety, environment, and energy education.
Materials and Methods: The present study was designed and implemented based on four steps. In the first step, the literature was studied, and the functional indicators of education were identified. The reliability and validity of the tool were examined under the supervision of a panel of experts. In the third step, the appropriate criteria for ranking key performance indicators of health, safety, environment, and energy (HSEE) education were selected using the present literature. Moreover, in the next step, the experts were provided with a checklist, including 43 key performance indicators for HSEE education based on smart metrics. Then the data were analyzed by combining the hierarchical analysis and Fuzzy TOPSIS.
Results: According to the obtained results, the highest weight related to the specificity criterion was reported as 0.34. The highest relative importance of the indicators was related to holding HSEE courses in the form of the workshop (CCI: 0.516), running HSEE courses electronically (CCI: 0.508), participating level of individuals in training (CCI: 0.505), which were ranked one to three.
Conclusion: The implementation of selected indicators with regard to the sensitivity and effective role of education in improving health, safety, and environmental management systems are the necessities of using these indicators, along with other indicators of this system.
Materials and Methods: The present study was designed and implemented based on four steps. In the first step, the literature was studied, and the functional indicators of education were identified. The reliability and validity of the tool were examined under the supervision of a panel of experts. In the third step, the appropriate criteria for ranking key performance indicators of health, safety, environment, and energy (HSEE) education were selected using the present literature. Moreover, in the next step, the experts were provided with a checklist, including 43 key performance indicators for HSEE education based on smart metrics. Then the data were analyzed by combining the hierarchical analysis and Fuzzy TOPSIS.
Results: According to the obtained results, the highest weight related to the specificity criterion was reported as 0.34. The highest relative importance of the indicators was related to holding HSEE courses in the form of the workshop (CCI: 0.516), running HSEE courses electronically (CCI: 0.508), participating level of individuals in training (CCI: 0.505), which were ranked one to three.
Conclusion: The implementation of selected indicators with regard to the sensitivity and effective role of education in improving health, safety, and environmental management systems are the necessities of using these indicators, along with other indicators of this system.
Type of Study: Research Article |
Subject:
Safety
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Articles Copyright © The Author(s).
Owned by Hamadan University of Medical Sciences.
Published by UMSHA Press
Journal Tel: +9881 38380090
Publisher Tel: +988138380548
Website: http://johe.umsha.ac.ir
Email: johe[at]umsha.ac.ir
