1. Askaripoor T, Shirali GA, Yarahmadi R, Kazemi E. Fire risk assessment and efficiency study of active and passive protection methods in reducing the risk of fire in a control room of at an industrial building. Saf Health Work. 2018; 8(1):93-102.
2. Van Weyenberge B, Deckers X, Caspeele R, Merci B. Development of an integrated risk assessment method to quantify the life safety risk in buildings in case of fire. Fire technol. 2019;55(4):1211-42. DOI: 10.1007/s10694-018-0763-6 [
DOI]
3. Jahangiri ME, Rajabi FA, Darooghe FA. Fire risk assessment in the selected Hospitals of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences in accordance with NFPA101. Iran Occup Health. 2016;13(1):99-106.
4. Parchami M, Mirzaei M, Kalatpour O. Identification and Analysis of Critical Activities of Fire Department for Residential Fire Scenarios Using Task and Training Requirements Analysis Methodology. J Occup Hyg Eng. 2020;7(1):41-50. DOI: 10.29252/johe.7.1.41 [
DOI]
5. Rahardjo HA, Prihanton M. The most critical issues and challenges of fire safety for building sustainability in Jakarta. J Build Eng. 2020;29(4):101133. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2019.101133 [
DOI]
6. Beck VR, Yung D. The development of a risk-cost assessment model for the evaluation of fire safety in buildings. Fire Saf Sci. 1994;4:817-28.
7. Buchanan AH, Abu AK. Structural design for fire safety. John Wiley & Sons; 2017.
8. Shahedi Aliabadi S, Assary MJ, Kalatpour O. arei, E.; Mohammadfam, I.“Consequence Modeling of Fire on Methane Storage Tanks in a Gas Refinery”. J Occup Hyg Eng. 2016;3(1).
9. Feiz Arefi M, Delju H, Ghasemi F, Kalatpour O. Accident Scenarios Identification and Assessment in the Central Oxygen of Hospital through FTA and evaluation of the control Systems by LOPA. J Occup Hyg Eng. 2020;7(2):26-32. DOI: 10.52547/johe.7.2.22 [
DOI]
10. Koffel WE. Changes to NFPA 101-2018: NFPA 101-2018: Life Safety Code has three important updates that are vital to fire protection engineers. Consult Specif Eng. 2019;56(1):26-31.
11. Brzezińska D, Bryant P. Risk Index Method–A Tool for Sustainable, Holistic Building Fire Strategies. Sustainability. 2020;12(11):4469. DOI: 10.3390/su12114469 [
DOI]
12. Šakėnaitė J. A comparison of methods used for fire safety evaluation. Science Future of Lithuania. 2010;2(6):36-42. DOI: 10.3846/mla.2010.109 [
DOI]
13. Khakkar S, Ranjbarian M, Khodakarim S, Pouyakian M. Evaluation of Fire Risk in Commercial Complexes of District 12 of Tehran and its Relationship with their Structural and Usage Characteristics. Saf Health Work. 2020;10(3):273-89.
14. Hesarshahabi AK, Mirzaei R, Gholamnia R. Fire Risk Assessment in Selected Commercial Buildings in Mashhad, Iran, Based on NFPA 101 Standard in 2018. Revista J Rescue Relief. 2019;11(3):184-91. DOI: 10.52547/jorar.11.3.184 [
DOI]
15. Khakkar S, Ranjbarian M, Pouyakian M. Study of CFSES software compliance with Iranian national standards for fire safety assessment of commercial complexes. Journal of Health in the Field. 2019;7(1):26-35. DOI: 10.22037/jhf.v7i1. 23734 [
DOI]
16. Benichou N, Kashef AH, Reid I, Hadjisophocleous GV, Torvi DA, Morinville G. FIERAsystem: a fire risk assessment tool to evaluate fire safety in industrial buildings and large spaces. J. Fire Prot. Eng. 2005;15(3):145-72. DOI: 10.1177/1042391505049437 [
DOI]
17. Rajabi F, Jahangiri M, Tavana Shooli F. Rastkar Sh. Fire risk Assessment in Multi-story Commercial Buildings Using Computerized Fire Safety Evaluation System: A Case Study in Shiraz. J Health Syst Res. 2019;15(1):74-82. DOI: 10.32592/hsr.2019.15.1.106 [
DOI]